45 Accessible Housing Statistics

These accessible housing figures cover the measurement periods and populations identified in the available source material. Estimates, surveys and forecasts retain their reported scope.

Key Accessible Housing Statistics

The main findings are:

  • About 50.2 million occupied U.S. housing units were aging-ready in 2019, equal to 40.4% of 124.1 million units (United States occupied housing units).
  • A step-free entryway was present in 53.6% of U.S. occupied housing units (2019).
  • New England had a 33.6% step-free-entry share (2019).
  • Ramps were present in 5.1% of occupied U.S. housing units (2019).
  • About 11.2 million older Americans reported serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs in 2019 (United States older population).
  • Seventy-five percent of adults age 50 and older wanted to remain in their current home as they aged (2024 survey).
  • New England had the lowest aging-ready share among the listed Census divisions at 19.6% (2019).
  • Single-floor homes accounted for 51.4% of occupied U.S. housing units (2019).
  • The Mid-Atlantic had a 47.6% step-free-entry share (2019; Middle Atlantic).
  • Chair, stair, or platform lifts were present in 1.0% of occupied U.S. housing units (2019).
  • Among the oldest households, 44.5% reported difficulty walking or climbing stairs (2019).
  • Seventy-three percent of adults age 50 and older wanted to remain in their current community as they aged (2024 survey).
  • The West South Central division had the highest aging-ready share at 61.6% (2019).
  • Among multistory units, 45.8% had a bedroom on the entry level (2019).
  • The East North Central division had a 39.9% step-free-entry share (2019).

Contents

Accessible housing statistics: how many U.S. homes are aging-ready

Census definition requires a step-free entryway plus a bedroom and full bathroom on the first floor; it excludes many other accessibility features.

AHS estimate; aging-ready uses the report’s three-feature definition.

AHS estimate; regional differences partly reflect building type and population needs.

Regions aggregate divisions with different housing stock and survey estimates.

AHS estimate using the report’s aging-ready definition.

Accessible housing data on step-free entries and first-floor living

AHS feature measure; step-free entry does not by itself make a home aging-ready.

AHS estimate; single-floor layout is one design feature, not a complete accessibility standard.

AHS estimate for multistory units.

AHS estimate; this is a layout measure and does not include a step-free entrance in this row.

Regional comparison from one AHS year; definitions are report-specific.

Accessible housing statistics by U.S. region and home layout

AHS estimate.

AHS estimates; building-type mix differs by division.

This is new-construction form, not the accessibility of all homes; the report cites Census construction data.

Construction trend; not a direct measure of accessible housing.

AHS feature measure; it does not indicate whether a ramp meets a particular code or need.

AHS feature measure.

AHS estimate.

Household module measure; mobility-assistive-device use is not the same as a Census disability determination.

HUD summary measure; accessibility needs were reported for the household and are broader than any single feature.

Serious difficulty is a Census disability measure; it is not a count of all people who could benefit from accessible design.

Subgroup estimate; the report’s oldest-household category should be retained when published.

The PDF passage reports this comparison in the context of older households lacking first-floor rooms; do not interpret it as the share of all older households.

Perception measure; the report identifies a gap between perceived adequacy and observed aging-ready features.

Accessible housing adoption, planned modifications, and aging-in-place preferences

  • Seventy-five percent of adults age 50 and older wanted to remain in their current home as they aged (2024 survey). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Seventy-three percent of adults age 50 and older wanted to remain in their current community as they aged (2024 survey). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Forty-four percent of adults age 50 and older expected to relocate at some point (2024 survey). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Forty-three percent of adults age 50 and older said they would need to make their homes more accessible as they aged (2024 survey). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Among adults planning home modifications, 72% anticipated bathroom changes such as grab bars or no-slip tile (2024 survey; United States adults age 50+). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Among adults planning home modifications, 71% anticipated easier entry or movement around the home, such as ramps, chairlifts, or wider doorways (2024 survey; United States adults age 50+). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Thirty-nine percent of adults age 50 and older who anticipated modifications identified kitchen upgrades as a planned change (2024 survey; United States adults age 50+). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Seventy-two percent of adults age 50 and older said trustworthy, high-quality contractors were extremely important in their community (2024 survey). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)
  • Sixty percent of adults age 18–49 said their community met their needs very or extremely well, compared with 71% of adults age 50+ (2024 survey). (2024 Home & Community Preferences…)

AARP survey preference, not observed residence; survey included 3,090 adults age 18+ and was fielded June 17-July 1, 2024.

Preference measure, not an accessibility inventory.

Expectation is not a recorded move; survey wording and weighting should be preserved.

Self-reported anticipated need, not completed modification rate.

Conditional percentage; it is not 72% of all adults age 50+ and does not measure installation completion.

Conditional anticipated-change measure; examples are respondent plans, not verified features.

Conditional survey result; kitchen upgrades are not equivalent to a formal accessibility standard.

Importance rating, not contractor availability or completed renovation volume.

Self-reported community satisfaction; age-group comparison from the 2024 survey.

Table of contents